cbd oil favicon

Author: Brian Cusack

Better Than Ibuprofen (According to Mice With Broken Legs)

The CBG pain research that’s too compelling to ignore—and too early to promise. The Broken Leg Study In 2023, researchers at Penn State College of Medicine broke the legs of laboratory mice. Specifically, they fractured their tibias—the shin bone. Then they gave some mice ibuprofen. Others got CBG, a non-psychoactive cannabinoid from cannabis. And they waited to see what would happen. The pain relief results? CBG matched ibuprofen perfectly. Both groups showed the same reduction in pain sensitivity—to pressure, to cold, to heat. Equal analgesic effect. But then something unexpected happened. When the researchers examined the healed bones weeks later, they found a stark difference: The ibuprofen group’s bones healed slower and weaker. The CBG group’s bones healed faster and stronger—with higher bone density, better mineralization, and greater mechanical strength. CBG didn’t just match ibuprofen for pain relief. It beat it. Here’s the problem: Those were mice, not humans. And every single impressive study on CBG for pain—and there are several now—has been conducted in rodents. Not a single human clinical trial exists yet for CBG and pain. So we’re left with a question: Is CBG actually better than ibuprofen for pain and healing? Or are we getting excited about mouse data that won’t translate? This article will show you: Let’s start with that broken leg study, because it’s the foundation of everything else. Pain Relief Without the Trade-Off Study Details: Published in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research in 2023—a high-impact, peer-reviewed journal—this controlled experiment came from Penn State College of Medicine. Mice with fractured tibias were divided into groups: some received CBG, some received NSAID pain medication (similar to ibuprofen), and some received no treatment as controls. The researchers then measured two things: pain levels during healing, and the quality of the healed bone afterward. Pain Relief Results – CBG Matched NSAIDs: The researchers measured pain sensitivity using three different tests: Mechanical sensitivity: How much pressure could the mice tolerate on their broken leg? Cold sensitivity: How did they react to cold stimulation? Heat sensitivity: How quickly did they pull away from heat? Normally, a fractured bone makes you hypersensitive to all three. The area becomes painful to touch, painful in cold weather, painful with any temperature change. CBG normalized all three pain responses—just as effectively as NSAIDs. The mice treated with CBG showed pain sensitivity levels comparable to mice with no injury at all. Same as the ibuprofen-like NSAID group. In pain relief terms: tie game. Healing Results – CBG Won Decisively: But when the researchers examined the healed bones using micro-CT scans and mechanical testing, they found dramatic differences. CBG-treated mice had: NSAID-treated mice had: Think about that for a second. Both groups got equal pain relief. But one group healed properly. The other group’s healing was compromised. Why NSAIDs Impair Healing (And CBG Doesn’t): NSAIDs work by blocking inflammation—specifically by inhibiting COX enzymes that produce inflammatory prostaglandins. The problem? You need some inflammation to heal. The inflammatory phase of bone healing recruits immune cells and growth factors that trigger tissue repair. Block it completely, and you slow down the whole process. NSAIDs are so effective at blocking inflammation that they actually impair fracture healing, delay surgical recovery, and can interfere with tissue repair throughout the body. Orthopedic surgeons know this. They often tell patients to avoid NSAIDs during the first few weeks of bone healing—right when pain is worst. CBG, on the other hand, modulates inflammation differently. Instead of completely blocking the inflammatory cascade, CBG appears to dampen excessive inflammation while allowing the necessary inflammatory signals for healing to proceed. It takes the edge off pain without derailing the repair process. And somehow—through mechanisms the researchers are still investigating—it actually accelerates healing beyond normal rates. The Clinical Implications (If This Translates to Humans): Think about what this could mean: Fracture patients could manage pain without compromising bone healing. No more choosing between pain relief and optimal recovery. Post-surgical pain could be treated without slowing recovery. Patients could take something for pain without sabotaging the healing their surgery was meant to achieve. Sports injuries—tendon strains, ligament damage, muscle tears—might heal faster while pain is controlled. Athletes could return to play sooner. Chronic joint conditions might get both symptom relief and disease modification. Not just masking pain, but actually improving the underlying tissue health. Currently, doctors face a dilemma: Give NSAIDs for pain, knowing they slow healing. Or withhold effective pain relief to optimize healing. Patients suffer either way. CBG might eliminate that trade-off. The Massive Caveat: This was in mice. Mice with tiny fractured tibias, not humans with complex injuries. The dose used was high—scaled to human weight, it would be hundreds of milligrams. And bone healing in rodents doesn’t perfectly mirror bone healing in humans. We have different healing timelines, different bone structures, different metabolic responses. Mouse bones heal in weeks. Human bones take months. Will these results translate? We genuinely don’t know. But the study was rigorous. Peer-reviewed. Published in a respected journal. And the findings were striking enough that pain researchers took notice. Which brings us to the next question: Is the fracture study a fluke, or is there a pattern of CBG outperforming conventional pain treatments in preclinical research? The Nerve Damage Evidence The Broken Leg Study Wasn’t Alone: While the fracture study grabbed headlines, quieter research was showing CBG might excel at a different type of pain—one that’s notoriously difficult to treat. Neuropathic pain. This is pain from nerve damage: sciatica, diabetic neuropathy, chemotherapy-induced nerve pain, post-shingles pain. The kind that standard painkillers often fail to touch. The kind where patients cycle through gabapentin, Lyrica, antidepressants, and opioids—all with limited success and significant side effects. Study #1: The Chemotherapy Pain Model (2022) Researchers gave mice cisplatin—a chemotherapy drug known to cause severe peripheral neuropathy in cancer patients. It’s a devastating side effect. Patients finish chemotherapy cancer-free, but they’re left with permanent nerve damage. Numbness. Tingling. Burning pain. Hypersensitivity. The mice developed the hallmark signs: hypersensitivity to touch (light pressure

Read More »

The 2025 CBD & Medicinal Mushroom Research Roundup: 10 Studies That Changed Everything

2025 was a landmark year for natural supplement research. Not because we discovered miracle cures. But because we got honest answers to questions the wellness industry has been dancing around for years. Does CBD really work for chronic pain? Can Lion’s Mane actually make you smarter? Are medicinal mushrooms just expensive placebos? I spent the last two weeks reading every major study published in 2025 on CBD and medicinal mushrooms. And I’m going to be brutally honest with you about what I found. Some findings validated what we’ve been saying for years. Others completely challenged assumptions I’ve held since starting Dr. Hemp Me. Three studies in particular killed myths that have been costing customers money and preventing them from getting real benefits. And seven more revealed surprising applications—like the “energy mushroom” that dramatically improved sleep, or the CBG dimer that’s 8 times more potent than its parent molecule. This isn’t a sales pitch. It’s a science lesson. Because you deserve to know what actually works before spending money on supplements. Let’s dive in. The Three Myths That Died in 2025 Myth #1: CBD Works for Chronic Pain (Spoiler: Isolate Doesn’t) The Study: Chou et al., 2025 – Systematic review published in Annals of Internal Medicine I’ll be blunt: If you’re taking CBD isolate for chronic pain, you’re probably wasting your money. A massive systematic review analyzed 25 trials involving 2,300+ patients with chronic pain. The researchers looked at CBD-only products versus THC-containing cannabis products. The findings were stark: CBD-only products showed no significant benefit for chronic pain. None. Whether it was back pain, arthritis pain, or neuropathic pain—CBD isolate failed to beat placebo in most measures. But THC-rich cannabis products? Those showed small but significant pain relief, especially for neuropathic pain (nerve-related pain). Now here’s where it gets interesting. A separate Phase 3 trial published in Nature Medicine (Karst et al., 2025) tested a full-spectrum extract called VER-01 in 820 patients with chronic low back pain. The result? Significant pain reduction compared to placebo. The difference was modest (-0.6 points on a 0-10 pain scale), but statistically significant and meaningful to patients. What This Actually Means: The entourage effect is real. CBD needs THC and other cannabinoids to work effectively for pain. This is why we’ve always focused on full-spectrum extracts at Dr. Hemp Me. Not because it sounds better in marketing, but because isolated CBD doesn’t do what whole-plant extracts do. In Ireland and the EU, we’re limited to trace THC (0.2% or less). That’s not the therapeutic amounts used in these studies. But even trace amounts of THC plus CBD plus CBG plus CBC plus terpenes creates a more effective product than CBD alone. Bottom line: If you’re buying CBD isolate for pain, save your money. If pain relief is your goal, full-spectrum is non-negotiable. Myth #2: Lion’s Mane is a “Smart Drug” You Take Once The Study: Surendran et al., 2025 – Published in Frontiers in Nutrition This one hurt my feelings a bit, but I’m glad they tested it. UK researchers gave healthy young adults (ages 18-35) a single 3g dose of Lion’s Mane extract. Then they tested cognitive performance 90 minutes later. Result: Absolutely nothing. No improvement in memory. No boost in processing speed. No mood enhancement. The only thing that improved was performance on one specific motor task (pegboard test), which honestly could have been practice effect. My first reaction: “Wait, but Lion’s Mane works! I take it daily and feel sharper!” Then I read the rest of the research, and it made perfect sense. The Study: Menon et al., 2025 – Systematic review in Frontiers in Nutrition This comprehensive review looked at all the Lion’s Mane research from recent years. Here’s what actually works: The pattern is clear: Lion’s Mane is not a stimulant. It’s a nourishing tonic. Think of it like fish oil for your brain. You don’t take one fish oil capsule and suddenly have better cardiovascular health. You take it daily for months, and gradually, your inflammatory markers improve. Lion’s Mane works by promoting nerve growth factor (NGF) and BDNF production. These proteins help your brain build new connections and protect existing neurons. That takes time. What This Actually Means: If you tried Lion’s Mane once or twice and felt nothing, that’s completely normal. You didn’t fail. The supplement didn’t fail. You just expected acute effects from something that works chronically. Give it 8-12 weeks of consistent daily use. That’s when the research shows benefits appear. At Dr. Hemp Me, we recommend 500mg-1g daily of a quality extract. Not because more is better (see Myth #3), but because that’s what the studies showing benefits actually used. Myth #3: More = Faster Results This might be the most important finding for your wallet and your health. I’ve watched customers make this mistake for years: “If one capsule is good, three must be better and faster, right?” The 2025 research showed the exact opposite. Lion’s Mane: Reishi Meta-Analysis (Mirzaei Fashtali et al., 2025): CBD: The universal pattern: Start low. Go slow. Give it time. What This Actually Means: Taking more doesn’t get you there faster. Sometimes it costs more money for the same (or worse) results. Sometimes it stresses your body unnecessarily. This is why at Dr. Hemp Me we emphasize “minimum effective dose” in all our guidance. Not because we want to sell you less (we’d make more money if you bought more), but because that’s what the science supports. If 20mg of CBD helps your anxiety, taking 100mg won’t help five times more. It might help the same amount, or cause side effects, or stress your liver. Quality at moderate doses beats quantity at any dose. The 7 Other Major Discoveries from 2025 1. The Energy Mushroom That Helps You Sleep The Study: Zhao et al., 2025 – Frontiers in Neurology This was 2025’s most surprising finding. Cordyceps is famous as the “athlete’s mushroom” for endurance and energy. But a Chinese trial tested fermented Cordyceps sinensis in 90 patients

Read More »
CBGD Cannabizetol

Cannabizetol: The Newly Discovered Cannabinoid Hiding in Full-Spectrum Extracts

In September 2025, researchers at the University of Milano published something remarkable in the Journal of Natural Products. They discovered a cannabinoid that’s been hiding in cannabis plants all along. Cannabizetol. The third known “dimeric cannabinoid” ever found. So rare—under 0.1% of plant material—that it took specialized extraction and synthesis just to identify it. But here’s what made me sit up and take notice: When they tested it against inflammation in human skin cells, cannabizetol downregulated 17 inflammatory genes. Its parent molecule, CBG, only downregulated 2. Not twice the effect. Not even five times. Nearly nine times more genes affected. This matters for anyone using full-spectrum CBD oils. Because cannabizetol is almost certainly in there. In trace amounts. Contributing to effects we attribute to other cannabinoids. In this article, I’ll break down: Let’s dive in. What Is Cannabizetol? Chemical name: Cannabizetol (abbreviated as CBGD, which stands for CBG Dimer) Structure: Two cannabigerol (CBG) molecules linked together by a methylene bridge (-CH2-) Class: Methylene-bridged dimeric cannabinoid (extremely rare) Discovery: First isolated and fully characterized in 2025 Concentration: Under 0.1% of plant material (approximately 0.02-0.06%) Understanding Dimers Simply Imagine two LEGO blocks clicking together. Each block—let’s say it’s CBG—has certain properties. It fits certain spaces. It connects certain ways. But when you click two blocks together with a connecting piece (the methylene bridge), the new structure has entirely different properties than either block alone. It’s bigger. It has a different shape. It connects to things the single blocks couldn’t reach. That’s what happens with cannabizetol. Two CBG molecules link together through a single carbon atom. That simple connection changes everything about how the molecule behaves. The Other Known Dimers Cannabizetol isn’t the first dimeric cannabinoid discovered. It’s the third: All three share the same basic structure: two cannabinoid molecules holding hands through a methylene bridge. Why So Rare? Dimeric cannabinoids are incredibly rare for several reasons: Low natural concentrations: They form in tiny amounts—under 0.1% of plant material. That means in 1000mg of cannabinoids, maybe 1mg is cannabizetol. Difficult to isolate: Extracting and purifying something present at 0.02% requires sophisticated equipment and techniques. Not routinely tested: Standard cannabinoid testing panels screen for 10-15 major cannabinoids. Dimers aren’t on the list. Labs don’t even have reference standards for them. Only recently characterized: We didn’t know what to look for. Scientists needed to synthesize cannabizetol first, characterize its structure, then go back to plant extracts to confirm it exists naturally. How Do They Form? Dimers can form through several pathways: If you could see cannabizetol at the molecular level, it would look like two CBG molecules holding hands through a single carbon atom. That’s the methylene bridge. One carbon. But it changes everything. The Anti-Inflammatory Research The University of Milano team didn’t just discover cannabizetol. They tested it. They wanted to know: does this dimer have biological activity? And how does it compare to its parent molecule (CBG) and the other known dimer (cannabitwinol)? The Study Setup Cell type: HaCaT cells (human keratinocytes – skin cells) Why skin cells? These are the most widely used model for studying skin inflammation. They’re involved in conditions like acne, eczema, and psoriasis. Comparison: They tested three compounds side-by-side: Focus: Inflammatory pathways relevant to skin conditions Let me walk you through what they found. Finding #1: IL-8 Inhibition IL-8 is an inflammatory marker that recruits immune cells to sites of inflammation. When you have acne, eczema, psoriasis, or general skin irritation, IL-8 levels go up. The researchers induced inflammation with TNFα (a pro-inflammatory signal), then treated cells with cannabizetol. The results: At 1 μM concentration: 30% reduction in IL-8 At 5 μM concentration: Complete elimination of IL-8 release Not reduced. Not suppressed. Completely shut down. The IC50 (concentration that inhibits 50% of the response) was 1.46 μM for cannabizetol. For comparison, cannabitwinol (the CBD dimer) had an IC50 of 6.39 μM. Cannabizetol is 4.4 times more potent than cannabitwinol at shutting down IL-8. Finding #2: NF-κB Inhibition NF-κB is the master switch for inflammation. Think of it like the control panel for your home’s electrical system. Flip the main breaker, and everything downstream turns off. NF-κB controls hundreds of inflammatory genes. When it’s activated, those genes turn on. When it’s inhibited, they stay quiet. Cannabizetol inhibited NF-κB activation with an IC50 of 4.95 μM. Cannabitwinol needed 19.8 μM to achieve the same effect. Cannabizetol is 4 times more potent at shutting down the master inflammation switch. Finding #3: Gene Expression Analysis (The Most Impressive) This is where cannabizetol really surprised the researchers—and me. They ran a gene expression array testing 84 inflammatory genes. These genes control everything from cytokine production to immune cell recruitment to tissue damage. They treated cells with TNFα to induce inflammation. Then they added either: Results with CBG: Only 2 genes were downregulated significantly (CCL5 and CCL2) Results with cannabizetol: 17 genes were downregulated significantly Let that sink in. The dimer affected 8.5 times more genes than its parent molecule. Which genes were affected? Some of the most important ones: This isn’t just suppressing one pathway. Cannabizetol affects multiple inflammatory pathways simultaneously. A multi-target approach. Exactly what you want for complex inflammatory conditions. Finding #4: Antioxidant Activity Beyond anti-inflammatory effects, cannabizetol showed “remarkable antioxidant” activity. Higher than cannabitwinol. Higher than expected. This is important because inflammation and oxidative stress often go hand-in-hand. Inflammatory conditions create oxidative damage. Oxidative damage drives more inflammation. It’s a vicious cycle. Cannabizetol addresses both problems at once. Safety Profile Zero cytotoxicity at all tested concentrations (0.5-20 μM). This is critical. Potent doesn’t mean toxic. Cannabizetol shuts down inflammation without harming cells. Why Dimers Are More Potent Than Parents Here’s what puzzled me when I first read this study: CBG is already anti-inflammatory. We know this. It’s been tested. So why is cannabizetol—literally two CBGs linked together—so much more potent? Shouldn’t it be about twice the effect? Instead, it’s affecting 8.5 times more genes. The Answer: New Molecular Architecture When two cannabinoid molecules link through a methylene bridge, you

Read More »
black_friday

The Complete Dr. Hemp Me Dosing Guide: Calculate Your Proper Dose in 60 Seconds

The Supplement Industry’s Dirty Secret Here’s something most CBD companies won’t tell you. That bottle you bought? It’s probably under-dosed by 50-70%. Not because the product is bad. Not because the CBD isn’t real. Because the company designed it around profit margins instead of clinical research. They reference a study showing CBD helps with pain. The study used 50-100mg daily. Their product? 10mg per serving, marketed as a “30-day supply.” The math doesn’t work. And when you don’t see results, you think CBD failed you. But CBD didn’t fail. The dose did. I know this because I’ve spent seven years building Dr. Hemp Me around one simple principle: formulate products based on what the research actually says, not what’s convenient to sell. And after thousands of conversations with customers who said “I tried CBD before and it didn’t work,” I realized something. Most people have no idea how much they’re actually taking. So I built this guide. It’s going to show you exactly how much CBD, Lion’s Mane, and functional mushrooms you need based on clinical research. Not marketing claims. Not guesswork. Science. And I’m going to introduce you to SuppGenie — an AI tool that answers your dosing questions based on actual RCT studies. Think ChatGPT, but trained exclusively on supplement research. Because precision matters. Let’s get started. Why Dosing Matters: What the Clinical Studies Actually Say Before we dive into specific products, you need to understand something fundamental. CBD and functional mushrooms are dose-dependent. That means there’s a minimum effective dose. Below that threshold, you might feel subtle effects. Maybe. But the robust, measurable benefits shown in clinical trials? They require specific dosing. Here’s what the research shows: CBD for Pain Relief Clinical studies use 40-160mg daily of CBD for chronic pain management. Some studies on severe pain conditions use even higher doses. Most “500mg bottles” marketed as a month’s supply? If you’re taking the proper clinical dose, that’s 3-10 days max. CBD for Anxiety & Calm For daily anxiety management, studies use 25-75mg daily for maintenance dosing. For acute anxiety episodes, single doses of 300-600mg of CBD isolate have shown significant effects in research settings. CBD for Sleep Studies examining CBD for sleep quality typically use 40-160mg taken 30-60 minutes before bed. When combined with complementary compounds like Reishi mushroom or L-theanine, the effective dose can be optimized within this range. Lion’s Mane for Focus & Cognition Clinical trials use 500-3000mg daily of Lion’s Mane extract (8:1 to 10:1 concentration ratio). Most cognitive benefits appear after 4-8 weeks of consistent use at proper dosing. Reishi for Stress & Immune Support Research uses 1000-3000mg daily of Reishi extract (10:1 to 20:1 concentration). Immune modulation effects become measurable after 8-12 weeks of consistent use. Here’s the pattern you’ll notice: Real results take time. And they require proper dosing every single day. That’s why stocking up matters. You can’t see results from a week of inconsistent use. Now let’s break down each product and show you exactly how to calculate YOUR dose. How to Use SuppGenie (Your Personal Dosing AI) Before we get into specific products, let me show you how to use SuppGenie. What is SuppGenie? It’s an AI-powered research assistant I built specifically to solve this problem. Think ChatGPT, but trained exclusively on supplement dosing from actual RCT (randomized controlled trial) studies. You simply ask it questions about dosing, and it gives you answers backed by clinical research. No forms to fill out. No dropdowns. Just conversation. How to use it: What makes it different: Unlike generic AI tools, SuppGenie only references actual clinical studies. It won’t guess. It won’t give you bro-science. It shows you exactly what the research says and cites the studies. I’ll include SuppGenie links for each product below. Use them. They’re free. And they’ll save you from guessing. Now let’s break down each product. Product-by-Product Dosing Guide 1. Recovery Bundle (30% Full Spectrum CBD Oil + Tiger Balm) — PAIN RELIEF What it is: Our maximum-strength CBD oil (30% = 3000mg per 10ml bottle) plus CBD-infused Tiger Balm for topical relief. The dual-action approach: What the studies say: For chronic pain management, clinical trials use 40-160mg of CBD daily depending on pain severity and body weight. Your dose: Ask SuppGenie: “How much CBD for chronic pain?” → Example dosing: How many bottles do you need? At proper dosing, one 10ml bottle (3000mg) lasts: For 3-month supply: Most people need 2-4 bottlesFor 6-month supply: Most people need 4-8 bottles When to expect results: Pro tip: Use the Tiger Balm topically on painful joints or muscles 2-3 times daily in combination with oral CBD for maximum relief. Shop Recovery Bundle (Buy One Get One Free) → 2. 10% Full Spectrum CBD Oil (The Calm Oil) — ANXIETY & STRESS What it is: Our most popular product. 10% CBD concentration (1000mg per 10ml bottle). Full spectrum means you get the entourage effect — all beneficial cannabinoids working together. What the studies say: For daily anxiety management, clinical research uses 25-75mg daily for maintenance. For social anxiety or acute stress, single doses of 300-600mg CBD isolate have shown rapid effects. Our full spectrum oil requires lower doses due to the entourage effect. Your dose: Ask SuppGenie: “How much CBD for anxiety?” → Example dosing: How many bottles do you need? At proper dosing, one 10ml bottle (1000mg) lasts: For 3-month supply: Most people need 6-9 bottlesFor 6-month supply: Most people need 12-18 bottles When to expect results: Pro tip: CBD for anxiety works best with consistency. Take it at the same time every day, even on days you feel calm. You’re building a new baseline, not just treating symptoms. Shop 10% Calm Oil (Buy One Get One Free) → 3. CBD Snooze Oil + Reishi Bundle — SLEEP SUPPORT What it is: CBD Snooze Oil (1000mg CBD optimized for sleep) plus complementary Reishi mushroom extract. The dual-action approach: What the studies say: Sleep studies use 40-160mg of CBD taken 30-60 minutes before bed. Reishi studies use

Read More »

Suppgenie: What do the studies say about using L-Theanine for sleep? What is an affective does ?

Summary: Human clinical trials and reviews indicate that L-theanine may improve subjective sleep quality—primarily by reducing anxiety and promoting relaxation, rather than acting as a sedative. An effective oral dose supported by several studies and reviews is 200 mg taken before bed. Studies at 250–400 mg/day have also been explored in populations with comorbid anxiety, depressive disorders, or schizophrenia, with improvement in sleep quality consistently related to L-theanine’s anxiolytic effects. Details: Key Human Research (Relevant Dosages and Effects on Sleep): Systematic Review – Rao et al., JACN 2015 Design: Summary of multiple human studies (including actigraphy, sleep questionnaires, ANS monitoring). Dose: 200 mg L-theanine before bed. Population: Adults and children, some with sleep complaints. Effects: Improved sleep quality via reduction in anxiety (not direct sedation), better WASO scores, improved parasympathetic activity, and subjective sleep markers. Safety: No adverse events at 200 mg; NOAEL (no observed adverse effect level) above 2000 mg/kg in animal models. Open-Label Clinical Trial – Hidese et al., Acta Neuropsychiatrica 2017 Design: 8-week open-label supplementation. Dose: 250 mg/day. Population: 20 patients with major depressive disorder. Effects: Statistically significant improvements on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), as well as anxiety and depression scores. Compliance/Limitations: Not placebo-controlled; findings need confirmation in RCTs. Randomized Controlled Trials/Neurocognitive Studies (Doses 200–400 mg): These studies typically used L-theanine for cognitive/attentional effects but also measured anxiety and sleep outcomes as secondary endpoints. Where reported, these doses were safe and associated with improved subjective sleep quality. Research Notes: Several animal studies support L-theanine’s sleep-improving effects especially by counteracting caffeine-induced sleep disruption. Main mechanism is anxiolysis (promotion of relaxation and decreased stress), which supports better sleep onset and maintenance without causing next-day drowsiness. Safety profile is robust; published adverse events at effective sleep-related doses (200–400 mg) are rare or absent. Compliance Note: US (FDA): “Supports relaxation” and “may help reduce occasional stress to support sleep quality” are generally acceptable structure/function claims, but “treats insomnia” or “induces sleep” is NOT compliant for supplements. EU (EFSA): No approved sleep claims specific for L-theanine; “relaxation” claims require documented human evidence and careful wording to avoid therapeutic claims. Key Doses Supported by Evidence (For Sleep): 200 mg L-theanine (most commonly studied, before bed) Up to 400 mg/day has been used in studies on populations with concurrent psychiatric symptoms No significant risk for adverse effects at these doses in clinical trials. Summary Table: Study Type Population Dose Effect on Sleep Notable Safety Issues Review (RCTs/Obs) Adults, Children 200 mg Improved quality (via relaxation/anxiolysis) None at studied dosage Clinical (Open-label) MDD patients 250 mg Improved PSQI scores None reported RCTs (Neurocogn.) Healthy adults 200–400 mg Less sleep disruption (secondary effect) None reported Bottom Line: Robust human data support 200 mg L-theanine (taken before bed) as a safe, effective dose for supporting better sleep quality through relaxation and anxiety reduction. Larger or longer-term studies may use up to 400 mg, but most marketing claims should emphasize “relaxation” and “sleep quality” rather than direct sleep induction, due to regulatory constraints. References (for citation): Rao TP et al., J Am Coll Nutr. 2015;34(5):436-447. doi:10.1080/07315724.2014.926153 Hidese S et al., Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2017;29(5):291-299. doi:10.1017/neu.2016.33 Let me know if you need sample compliant marketing language or additional regulatory details! Sources: L-theanine partially counteracts caffeine-induced sleep disturbances in rats. In Search of a Safe Natural Sleep Aid. Pharmacokinetics of L-theanine and the effect on amino acid composition in mice administered with L-theanine. Dose-response effect of L-theanine on psychomotor speed, sustained attention, and inhibitory control: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. +6 more Follow-Up Question(s): Certainly! Here are 3 insightful follow-up questions a reader might ask about using L-theanine for sleep: Are there any notable differences in the effectiveness or safety of L-theanine for sleep between younger adults, older adults, and children? How does L-theanine compare to other natural sleep-support ingredients—such as melatonin or valerian—in randomized clinical trials, both for effectiveness and for side effect profile? Can L-theanine be safely combined with other common sleep supplements or medications, and are there any contraindications or interactions to be aware of according to clinical research?

Read More »

The Vaccine Side Effect Study That Changes Everything: A Complete Breakdown

What happens when you combine two ancient mushrooms with modern vaccines? University of California researchers just found out. My first COVID shot happened to fall on a Friday afternoon. By Saturday morning, I felt like I’d been hit by a truck. Headache pounding. Body aching. That weird foggy brain where even simple tasks feel impossible. It took three days to feel normal again. And I’m lucky. Some people feel worse. Some people feel terrible for a week. Here’s what bothers me most. About 30% of people say they avoid vaccines specifically because of side effects. Not because they don’t believe vaccines work. Just because feeling miserable for days isn’t appealing. Can you blame them? But what if vaccine side effects didn’t have to be so brutal? What if there was a way to get protection without the punishment? Researchers at the University of California just published something remarkable. They tested two medicinal mushrooms alongside COVID vaccines. The results surprised everyone. People who took the mushrooms had almost no side effects. Same vaccine. Same protection. Completely different experience. And six months later? Their antibody levels were actually stronger than people who didn’t take the mushrooms. This isn’t marketing hype. This is peer-reviewed science published in one of the most respected journals in the field. And it changes how we think about immune support. Let me walk you through exactly what they found. The Study: What They Actually Did The research team was led by Dr. Gordon Saxe at UC San Diego. Paul Stamets, the famous mycologist you might know from Joe Rogan’s podcast, was a co-author. They recruited 90 healthy adults who were scheduled to get COVID vaccines or boosters. These were regular people. Not sick. Not immunocompromised. Just folks getting their shots. The researchers split them into two groups randomly. Half got mushroom capsules. Half got fake capsules filled with rice powder. Nobody knew which group they were in. Not the participants. Not the researchers giving out the capsules. That’s called “double-blind” and it’s the gold standard for eliminating bias. The mushroom capsules contained two species. Agarikon and Turkey Tail. Not the mushroom part you see above ground. The mycelium. That’s the root-like network that grows underground. Think of mushrooms like trees. Most people eat the fruit (the part above ground). But the mycelium is like the roots and trunk. That’s where a lot of the medicinal compounds live. The dosing was simple. Eight capsules, three times per day, for four days. That’s it. They started taking capsules the day they got vaccinated. They continued for three more days. Then they stopped. Four days total. Then the researchers tracked what happened for six months. What Happened: The Side Effect Story The first thing they measured was side effects. Everyone tracked their symptoms for five days after vaccination. Fever. Headache. Fatigue. Muscle aches. Injection site pain. All the usual stuff. Here’s where it gets interesting. The participants fell into two natural categories. Some had never had COVID before and had never been vaccinated. Let’s call them “COVID-naive.” Others had either caught COVID previously or had been vaccinated before. Let’s call them “COVID-exposed.” Your immune system treats these situations completely differently. If you’ve never seen COVID before, your immune system is meeting it for the first time. That’s when vaccines tend to hit hardest. Your body is figuring out what this new threat is. If you’ve had COVID or prior vaccines, your immune system already has some memory. It knows what to do. The reaction is usually milder. The researchers discovered something remarkable when they split the data this way. In COVID-naive people: The placebo group felt terrible on days two and three. Side effect scores shot up dramatically. Headaches. Fatigue. Body aches. The full miserable experience. The mushroom group? Their side effect scores barely increased at all. On day three, the difference was huge. Statistically significant. Not a fluke. By day five, the placebo group was still feeling rough. The mushroom group was basically back to normal. Same vaccine. Same immune protection being built. Completely different experience. In COVID-exposed people: The mushrooms made no difference to side effects. Both groups felt similar levels of discomfort. Why? Because their immune systems were already primed. They weren’t having that massive first-time reaction. There was less inflammation to modulate. This tells us something important. The mushrooms weren’t suppressing immunity. They were modulating the response in people whose immune systems were working extra hard. Think of it like a volume knob on a stereo. If the music is already at a comfortable level, turning the knob doesn’t do much. But if the music is blasting and hurting your ears, turning it down helps a lot. The Antibody Story: Protection That Lasts Side effects matter. But protection matters more. If the mushrooms reduced side effects by weakening the immune response, that would be terrible. You’d feel better but be less protected. The opposite happened. The researchers measured antibody levels at multiple time points. Day three. Day fourteen. Day twenty-eight (or day forty-two for people who got two-dose vaccines). And six months. Antibodies are like soldiers that fight viruses. More antibodies generally means better protection. Here’s the typical pattern after vaccination. Antibody levels shoot up in the first few weeks. They peak around four to six weeks. Then they gradually decline over months. That decline is normal. Your body doesn’t keep maximum antibody levels forever. It’s too resource-intensive. Instead, your body makes memory B-cells. Think of these like a recipe book. They store the instructions for making antibodies quickly if the virus shows up again. Active antibodies are like having soldiers on patrol. Memory B-cells are like having a military academy that can train new soldiers fast when needed. Here’s what the researchers found: In the placebo groups (both COVID-naive and COVID-exposed), antibody levels followed the normal pattern. Up, then down over six months. In the COVID-exposed mushroom group, antibody levels also declined normally. But in the COVID-naive mushroom group? Something different happened. Their antibody levels

Read More »
g2a12OIl-STAMETS-STACK-BLOG

The Age-Dependent Discovery: How Paul Stamets’ Three-Mushroom Stack Revealed Something Unexpected About Aging Brains

The largest longitudinal study of psilocybin microdosing just revealed something unexpected. Mental health improved across everyone—younger and older alike. Depression dropped. Anxiety decreased. Mood lifted. That was expected. But motor function? That only improved in one group. Adults 55 and older. And only when they combined three specific compounds: psilocybin, Lion’s Mane mycelium, and niacin. Co-authored by mycologist Paul Stamets, this 2022 research published in Scientific Reports is the first to show age-dependent benefits from combining mushroom compounds. The study tracked 953 microdosers and 180 non-microdosers for 30 days, revealing a pattern that challenges how we think about interventions for aging brains. This article explores what they found, why it might work, and what it means for the future of healthy aging research. Who is Paul Stamets? Paul Stamets isn’t just a supplement entrepreneur. He’s a mycologist with over four decades of research, a published scientist, and one of the world’s leading advocates for the medicinal potential of mushrooms. You might know him from Netflix’s Fantastic Fungi or his appearances on the Joe Rogan podcast. But Stamets’ credentials run deeper than his public profile. He founded Fungi Perfecti in 1980 and has spent his career studying mycelium—the root-like network of mushrooms that he believes holds greater medicinal potential than the fruiting bodies most supplements use. His “Stamets Stack” became the most popular microdosing protocol in the world, not through marketing, but through grassroots adoption in microdosing communities. The combination is specific: psilocybin, Lion’s Mane mycelium, and niacin (vitamin B3). The rationale behind his stack: Psilocybin promotes neuroplasticity through 5-HT2A serotonin receptor activation. It helps the brain form new connections. Lion’s Mane mycelium stimulates nerve growth factor (NGF), supporting the physical growth and maintenance of neurons. Niacin causes vasodilation—the “flushing” effect that widens blood vessels. Stamets theorized this would enhance bioavailability, driving the other compounds across the blood-brain barrier more effectively. Three compounds. Three mechanisms. Potential synergy. But this wasn’t just theory. Stamets co-authored both the 2021 baseline study (8,703 participants from 84 countries) and the 2022 longitudinal follow-up we’re discussing today. He wasn’t lending his name—he was actively involved in the research design. Historical context matters here. The Aztecs combined psilocybin mushrooms with cacao in a preparation called “cacahua-xochitl.” Ancient wisdom recognized that combining compounds could produce different effects than single ingredients. Stamets modernized this approach with scientific specificity. The question his research asked: Does the combination actually work better than psilocybin alone? And if so, for whom? The Lion’s Mane Foundation: A Pattern Emerges If you read my earlier emails about Lion’s Mane, you already know this mushroom has a track record with aging brains. The Mori Study (2009): Japanese researchers gave Lion’s Mane to 50-80 year olds with mild cognitive impairment for 16 weeks. Cognitive function improved significantly compared to placebo. The benefits disappeared when they stopped taking it. This wasn’t a fringe study. It was published in Phytotherapy Research and remains one of the strongest human trials on Lion’s Mane. The Mechanism Study (2023): More recently, researchers at the University of Queensland identified how Lion’s Mane works. A compound called hericene A promotes neurotrophic activity—essentially telling brain cells to grow new connections. The study, published in the Journal of Neurochemistry, showed Lion’s Mane enhances neurite outgrowth in hippocampal neurons. This matters because it explains WHY the Mori study worked. It’s not placebo. It’s measurable biological activity. The pattern: Lion’s Mane alone shows cognitive benefits in older adults (50-80 age range). The mechanism involves nerve growth and brain connections. Now we’re seeing it as part of Stamets’ three-compound combination, and once again, the benefits appear specifically in older adults. A critical distinction: Stamets emphasizes mycelium over fruiting body. Animal studies suggest they contain different compounds and may produce different effects. Some research indicates mycelium promotes brain function while fruiting body extract may inhibit it. This becomes a limitation later—the study didn’t track which form participants used. With Lion’s Mane’s solo potential established, Stamets asked the next logical question: What happens when you combine it with psilocybin and niacin? Could synergistic effects produce outcomes beyond any single compound? The 2022 study set out to answer that question. The Study Design: How They Tested It Published: Scientific Reports (part of the Nature portfolio), 2022 Full title: “Psilocybin microdosers demonstrate greater observed improvements in mood and mental health at one month relative to non-microdosing controls” Sample: 953 microdosers, 180 non-microdosers Duration: Approximately 30 days of tracking Method: Mobile app-based observational study This was not a controlled clinical trial. It was an observational study, which means researchers didn’t give anyone psilocybin. They watched people who were already microdosing and compared them to people who weren’t. Why this methodology? Advantages: Real-world conditions. Large, diverse sample. Geographic spread (though predominantly North American). Anonymous participation via app reduced reporting bias. Limitations: No randomization. Self-selected participants (microdosers chose to microdose). Can’t prove causation, only association. Placebo effects can’t be ruled out. What they measured: Mental health: Depression (PHQ-9 scale), Anxiety (GAD-7 scale), Stress (Perceived Stress Scale) Psychomotor performance: Finger tap test Mood: Daily tracking via app Demographics: Age, gender, mental health status at baseline The finger tap test deserves explanation. It sounds simple, but it’s a validated neurological measure. Participants tap two circles on their phone screen in an alternating pattern for 10 seconds. The test measures motor speed, coordination, and response time—all markers of how well the brain and body communicate. This test appears in Parkinson’s research and aging studies because motor function often declines before cognitive function. Your hands slow down 5-10 years before memory problems appear. It’s an early warning system. The novel aspect: Stacking analysis Previous microdosing research treated all microdosers as one group. This study broke them into three subgroups: Psilocybin only (n=385, 40.4%) Psilocybin + Lion’s Mane (n=304, 31.9%) Psilocybin + Lion’s Mane + Niacin (n=264, 27.7%) — The full Stamets Stack This was the first research to examine whether combining compounds produces different outcomes than single compounds. The researchers also stratified by age: under 55 versus 55 and

Read More »
thai cbd variety

The Antibacterial Discovery Nobody Talked About: How Thailand Proved Cannabinoids Kill Superbugs

Last night, I told you about a discovery in Brazil that surprised the scientific community. Researchers found CBD—cannabidiol—in a common South American shrub called Trema micrantha. A plant that isn’t cannabis. A plant that grows wild across Brazil like a weed. The discovery made headlines. Legal alternatives to cannabis. New CBD sources for countries with restrictive regulations. A botanical workaround for hemp prohibition. Exciting stuff, especially for the convergent evolution angle—nature making the same compound in completely unrelated plant species, separated by millions of years. But while everyone was focused on Brazil’s preliminary findings, a more significant study sat quietly in a peer-reviewed journal, published two years earlier. Thailand. 2021. Same plant genus. Same cannabinoids. But the Thai researchers didn’t stop at chemical analysis. They tested the extracts against multidrug-resistant bacteria. And they worked. This is the story nobody talked about. The Thailand Study: What They Actually Did A team of researchers from multiple Thai universities—Thammasat University, Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, and Silpakorn University—collaborated on a comprehensive study of Trema orientalis. Same genus as the Brazilian discovery. Different species. Closely related to cannabis through phylogenetic analysis. Trema orientalis grows throughout tropical Asia. Common pioneer species—one of the first plants to colonize disturbed soil. Shows up uninvited in agricultural areas, forest edges, and beach forests. The researchers collected nine specimens from three distinct floristic regions in Thailand: Northern Thailand: Agricultural areas and forest edges in Uttaradit, Phitsanulok, and Phetchabun provinces. Southeastern Thailand: Beach forests in Chanthaburi, Rayong, and Trat provinces along the coast. Southern (Peninsular) Thailand: Agricultural and disturbed areas in Chumphon, Nakhon Si Thammarat, and Songkhla provinces. They specifically collected mature inflorescences—the flowers—during the flowering period from November 2019 to February 2020. Why flowers? Because in the cannabis family (Cannabaceae), cannabinoids concentrate in the flower structures, particularly in trichomes on the surface. The methodology was rigorous. Air-dried without sunlight. Ground into powder. Macerated in methanol for 10 days. Extracted and partitioned into hydrophilic and lipophilic fractions. The lipophilic fraction was further separated using column chromatography with gradient elution. Then analyzed with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using internal cannabinoid standards for precise identification. This wasn’t casual exploration. This was systematic, reproducible, scientifically rigorous analysis. Published in PeerJ, a respected peer-reviewed journal, in May 2021. And here’s what they found. The Cannabinoid Profile: CBN Takes the Lead All nine specimens, across all three regions, contained cannabinoids. THC (tetrahydrocannabinol), CBD (cannabidiol), and CBN (cannabinol) appeared in varying concentrations depending on geographic location and growing conditions. But one cannabinoid dominated: CBN. Northern Thailand samples: CBN: up to 357.46 mg/kg THC: up to 89.96 mg/kg CBD: not detected Southeastern Thailand samples (coastal): CBN: 50-55 mg/kg THC: not detected CBD: not detected Southern Thailand samples: CBN: up to 140.19 mg/kg THC: up to 38.13 mg/kg CBD: up to 5.22 mg/kg This is unusual. In cannabis, CBN is typically a minor cannabinoid. It forms when THC degrades through oxidation or aging. You find elevated CBN in old cannabis, stored products, material exposed to light and air. But in Trema orientalis, CBN appears to be the primary cannabinoid the plant actively produces. Not a degradation product. A deliberate biosynthetic output. Why would the plant prioritize CBN over CBD or THC? The answer became clear when they tested antibacterial activity. Testing Against Superbugs: The Part Everyone Missed The Thai researchers obtained four bacterial strains from the Department of Medical Science, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. Not random bacteria. WHO priority pathogens—the multidrug-resistant superbugs that cause serious infections and resist standard antibiotics: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300: Methicillin-resistant (MRSA). One of the most notorious hospital-acquired infection agents. Causes skin infections, pneumonia, bloodstream infections, and surgical site infections. Resistant to beta-lactam antibiotics including methicillin, oxacillin, and amoxicillin. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923: Standard strain for comparison. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853: Gram-negative bacteria that causes pneumonia, particularly in hospital settings and immunocompromised patients. Produces AmpC β-lactamase—an enzyme that breaks down antibiotics. Naturally resistant to many drug classes. Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606: Notorious for hospital-acquired infections. Causes pneumonia, bloodstream infections, wound infections, and meningitis. Extremely drug-resistant strains have emerged globally. Major problem in intensive care units. These are the bacteria that make infectious disease doctors nervous. The ones developing resistance faster than we develop new antibiotics. The researchers took the cannabinoid-containing fraction (labeled S3 in their study) and tested it using two methods: Disk diffusion assay: Paper disks soaked in extract, placed on bacterial cultures. If the extract inhibits growth, a clear zone appears around the disk. Broth microdilution assay: Serial dilutions to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)—the lowest concentration that stops bacterial growth. Both tests followed Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines—the gold standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The results: The cannabinoid fraction inhibited all four bacterial strains. Clear zones of inhibition: 8 to 14 millimeters diameter. MIC values: S. aureus ATCC 43300 (MRSA): 64.25 µg/mL S. aureus ATCC 25923: 31.25 µg/mL P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853: 31.25 µg/mL A. baumannii ATCC 19606: 31.25 µg/mL For context, those concentrations are comparable to pharmaceutical antibiotics tested in the same study. The northern Thailand samples—highest in CBN content—showed the strongest antibacterial activity across all bacterial strains. Cannabinoids from Trema orientalis killed multidrug-resistant bacteria at clinically relevant concentrations. And nobody talked about it. Traditional Medicine: Validation Centuries in the Making Here’s where the story gets interesting. Trema orientalis has been used in traditional medicine throughout tropical Asia for centuries. Particularly in Thailand and surrounding regions. The uses are well-documented in ethnobotanical literature: Respiratory infections: Bronchitis, pneumonia, pleurisy—inflammation of the membrane surrounding the lungs. Fever reduction: General antipyretic properties. Infectious diseases: Bacterial and viral infections, particularly of the respiratory system. The traditional preparation method: crush the inflorescences (flowers), extract the liquid, administer to patients—especially children—suffering from lung infections. J.M. Watt and M.G. Breyer-Brandwijk documented this use in their 1962 reference work The Medicinal and Poisonous Plants of Southern and Eastern Africa. Traditional healers across the region used Trema species specifically for respiratory ailments involving infection. Nobody understood the mechanism. The chemistry was unknown. The active compounds were

Read More »
cbd in brazilian shrub

Nature Made CBD Twice: The Brazilian Plant Discovery That Changes How We Think About Cannabidiol

Scientists in Brazil just discovered something that changes how we should think about CBD. They found it in a plant that isn’t cannabis. Trema micrantha blume. A common shrub that grows all over South America. Often considered a weed—the kind that sprouts up in abandoned lots and forest edges without anyone planting it. Chemical analysis confirmed it: the plant produces CBD in its fruits and flowers. No THC. Just CBD. The Brazilian government was impressed enough to hand the research team a $104,000 grant to figure out how to extract it and test whether it works as well as cannabis-derived CBD. For countries where cannabis remains illegal, this could be a regulatory game-changer. A legal source of CBD without any of the complications that come with growing Cannabis sativa. But that’s not what caught my attention. What caught my attention is this: Nature made CBD at least twice. Two completely unrelated plants, separated by millions of years of evolution, both produce the exact same molecule. That’s not a coincidence. This article explores what this discovery reveals about CBD itself—why evolution would create the same compound in different plant families, what that tells us about CBD’s biological importance, and whether Brazilian shrubs will actually replace hemp as our CBD source. Spoiler: probably not. But the reasons why are more interesting than you’d think. What They Found (And What They Didn’t) Let’s start with the facts. Who found it: Rodrigo Moura Neto, a molecular biologist at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. What they found: CBD in measurable quantities in the fruits and flowers of Trema micrantha blume. What they didn’t find: THC. Not a trace. This matters because cannabis prohibition is largely driven by THC—the psychoactive compound that gets users high. CBD doesn’t do that. It’s non-intoxicating, which is why it’s legal in many places where THC isn’t. But most CBD today comes from hemp, which is technically cannabis with less than 0.2% THC (in the EU) or 0.3% (in the US). Still cannabis. Still subject to regulations, stigma, and in some countries, outright bans. Trema micrantha sidesteps all of that. It’s not cannabis. It’s not even in the same plant family. The Plant Itself Trema micrantha grows throughout Brazil and much of South America. It’s a pioneer species—one of the first plants to colonize disturbed soil. Grows fast, spreads easily, thrives in poor conditions. Farmers and foresters often consider it a weed. An opportunistic shrub that shows up uninvited and takes over cleared land. Which means it’s abundant. Cheap to harvest. Requires no special cultivation. In Brazil, where cannabis remains illegal, this plant could provide a domestic CBD source without breaking any laws. “A legal alternative to using cannabis,” as Moura Neto put it. This Isn’t the First Time Here’s what makes this more than a one-off discovery: scientists had already found CBD in a related plant in Thailand. So we’re not talking about two instances anymore. We’re talking about at least three plant species that produce CBD. A pattern is emerging. CBD production isn’t unique to cannabis. It’s a solution that evolution has discovered multiple times, in multiple locations, in plants that aren’t closely related. What Happens Next The research is still preliminary. Results haven’t been peer-reviewed or published yet. The Brazilian team has a five-year timeline to: Develop optimal extraction methods for Trema Scale up production Test the CBD’s effectiveness in humans Compare it to cannabis-derived CBD Navigate regulatory approval (even non-cannabis CBD needs safety studies) So we’re years away from Trema-derived CBD products hitting shelves. But the discovery itself—the fact that this plant makes CBD at all—tells us something important about the molecule itself. When Nature Invents The Same Thing Twice There’s a term for what happened here: convergent evolution. It’s when unrelated species independently evolve similar traits because they face similar environmental pressures. Evolution finds the same solution multiple times because that solution works. Classic example: flight. Birds evolved wings. So did bats. So did insects. Completely different structures. Bird wings are modified forelimbs covered in feathers. Bat wings are modified hands with skin stretched between elongated fingers. Insect wings are entirely different—chitinous extensions that don’t correspond to any limb structure in vertebrates. Yet all three enable powered flight. Why? Because flight offers massive survival advantages. Access to food sources competitors can’t reach. Escape from predators. Efficient long-distance travel. The advantages are so significant that natural selection favored flying in three completely separate lineages. Eyes: Another Example Camera-like eyes evolved independently at least 50 times in different animal groups. Octopus eyes look remarkably similar to human eyes—lens, iris, retina, the whole setup. But they developed through completely different evolutionary pathways. Our retinas are “backwards” (light-sensing cells face away from incoming light). Octopus retinas are “forwards” (more efficient design, actually). Yet both converged on the same basic structure because it’s really effective at capturing visual information. Echolocation Bats and dolphins both use biological sonar to navigate and hunt. Bats evolved it to hunt flying insects in darkness. Dolphins evolved it to navigate murky ocean waters and detect prey. Same solution. Different environments. Different evolutionary histories. What This Tells Us When the same trait evolves multiple times independently, it’s solving a real problem. The solution is effective enough that natural selection keeps discovering it. These aren’t lucky accidents. They’re optimized solutions to specific challenges. Now apply this to CBD. Cannabis and Trema micrantha are unrelated plants. Different families. Different evolutionary paths. Millions of years of separation. Yet both produce cannabidiol. The question: What problem is CBD solving that two completely different plant species would independently evolve to produce it? The Plant’s Perspective: What’s CBD For? We tend to think about CBD in terms of what it does for humans. Pain relief. Anxiety reduction. Sleep support. But plants didn’t evolve CBD for us. They evolved it for themselves. Protection Against UV Radiation CBD and other cannabinoids absorb ultraviolet light. This protects plant tissues—especially flowers and developing seeds—from UV radiation damage. Think of it as botanical sunscreen. Cannabis

Read More »

Lion’s Mane for Cognitive Function: The Complete Study Breakdown

If you’re reading this, you either replied to our email about Lion’s Mane and memory, or you’re one of the people considering joining our community replication study. Either way, you deserve to know exactly what the science says. Not marketing spin. Not cherry-picked data. The full picture. This breakdown covers the two most important Lion’s Mane studies for cognitive function: Let’s start with the study that changed everything. Study #1: The Mori Study (2009) Full Citation Mori K, Inatomi S, Ouchi K, Azumi Y, Tuchida T. “Improving effects of the mushroom Yamabushitake (Hericium erinaceus) on mild cognitive impairment: a double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.” Phytother Res. 2009 Mar;23(3):367-72. Read the full study here → Why This Study Matters Before 2009, Lion’s Mane (Hericium erinaceus, also called Yamabushitake in Japan) was primarily studied for: But there was no human data showing it could actually improve cognitive function in people with memory concerns. The Mori study changed that. It’s the first (and for a long time, the only) double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial testing Lion’s Mane specifically for cognitive impairment in older adults. This is the study that every reputable Lion’s Mane supplement company cites when they talk about “clinically studied for brain health.” The question is: Does what’s in their bottle match what was in this study? More on that later. Study Design: What They Actually Did Population: What is MCI? It’s the stage between normal age-related memory decline and dementia. People with MCI notice memory problems, others might notice too, but it’s not severe enough to interfere significantly with daily life. About 10-20% of people over 65 have MCI, and it often (but not always) progresses to dementia. Intervention: Source Material: The tablets contained dried powder of Lion’s Mane fruiting bodies (the actual mushroom, not mycelium grown on grain). The mushroom was cultivated in Japan specifically for this study. Key Detail: This was a double-blind study, meaning neither the participants nor the researchers knew who was getting Lion’s Mane vs. placebo until after the data was analyzed. This is the gold standard for eliminating bias. How They Measured Cognitive Function The researchers didn’t just ask people “do you feel smarter?” They used a validated assessment tool called the HDSR (Hasegawa Dementia Scale-Revised) which is widely used in Japan to assess cognitive function. The HDSR tests: Scores range from 0-30. Lower scores indicate greater cognitive impairment. Participants were tested at: The Results: What Actually Happened Here’s where it gets interesting. At baseline (week 0): During treatment (weeks 8-16): The Lion’s Mane group showed progressive improvement in cognitive scores throughout the 16 weeks: The placebo group? Their scores stayed essentially the same or declined slightly (which is expected with MCI). Statistical significance: The difference between groups was significant at week 12 (p<0.05) and highly significant at week 16 (p<0.01). In plain English: This wasn’t chance. This was a real, measurable improvement. After stopping (week 20): This is the part most supplement companies don’t mention. Four weeks after participants stopped taking Lion’s Mane, their cognitive scores declined back toward baseline. They didn’t drop all the way back immediately, but the trajectory was clear: the benefits required ongoing supplementation. What Does This Actually Mean? Let’s be honest about what this study shows and what it doesn’t. What it DOES show: What it DOESN’T show: Clinical significance: A 4-point improvement on the HDSR (which is roughly what the Lion’s Mane group achieved) might sound small, but in the context of MCI, it’s substantial. For reference: Safety and Tolerability This is important: No adverse events were reported in the Lion’s Mane group. No stomach issues. No headaches. No interactions. No participants dropped out due to side effects. Compare this to pharmaceutical cognitive enhancers, which often cause: Lion’s Mane appears to be remarkably well-tolerated, even at 3g daily for 16 weeks. Study Limitations (Being Honest) No study is perfect. Here are the limitations: The Study-Washing Problem Here’s why this study matters for choosing a Lion’s Mane supplement: What the study used: What most supplements provide: To match the Mori study, you would need to take: This is why people try Lion’s Mane and feel nothing. They’re not taking what the study used. Study #2: The Mechanism (Martínez-Mármol et al., 2023) Full Citation Martínez-Mármol R, Chai Y, Conroy JN, et al. “Hericerin derivatives activates a pan-neurotrophic pathway in central hippocampal neurons converging to ERK1/2 signaling enhancing spatial memory.” J Neurochem. 2023;165(6):791-808. Read the full study here → Why This Study Matters The Mori study proved that Lion’s Mane works. The Martínez-Mármol study figured out how. This 2023 study from the University of Queensland (Australia) is groundbreaking because it: In other words: This isn’t folk medicine anymore. This is molecular neuroscience. What They Discovered The Active Compounds: The researchers isolated and identified specific molecules from Lion’s Mane: These are aromatic compounds with prenyl side chains — basically, small fat-soluble molecules that can cross the blood-brain barrier. The Mechanism: These compounds promote neurite outgrowth (the growth of new neuron branches) and neuritogenesis (the formation of new neural connections) through activation of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Here’s what that means in plain English: Your brain has signaling pathways that tell neurons to grow, connect, and strengthen their connections. One of the most important is the ERK1/2 pathway, which leads to: The novel finding: Hericene A activates ERK1/2 through a TrkB-independent pathway. Most neurotrophic compounds (like BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor) work by activating the TrkB receptor. Hericene A doesn’t. It uses a completely different route to arrive at the same destination (ERK1/2 activation). This means Lion’s Mane can potentially work synergistically with other neurotrophic factors, rather than competing for the same receptor. The Animal Study Results They tested Lion’s Mane extracts in mice for 31 days: Doses tested: Results: The most remarkable finding: Purified hericene A at just 5mg/kg was equally potent as 250mg/kg of crude extract. That’s a 50-fold concentration advantage. Why This Matters for Humans Translating mouse doses to human doses isn’t straightforward, but researchers often use a conversion factor of

Read More »